AI Toolkit

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Gemini vs Claude for coding: which AI writes better code? Compare benchmarks, context windows, pricing, and real developer workflows in 2026.

Google
Gemini 2.0 Pro

Large codebase analysis and cost-effective code generation

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$1.25
Output$5
Context Window2M

Key Strengths

  • 2M context window fits massive codebases
  • Affordable pricing for iterative development
  • Strong at understanding code structure and dependencies
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Professional software engineering and code quality

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$3
Output$15
Context Window200K

Key Strengths

  • Highest coding benchmark scores in its class
  • Excellent at debugging, refactoring, and code review
  • Claude Code CLI for agentic software engineering
Our Verdict

Claude Sonnet is the coding champion — it consistently outperforms on programming benchmarks and produces cleaner, more maintainable code. Gemini Pro counters with a 10x larger context window and lower pricing, making it better for analysing massive codebases. For code quality, pick Claude; for working with very large projects affordably, pick Gemini.

Quick Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 ProClaude Sonnet 4.6
ProviderGoogleAnthropic
Input Price / 1M tokens$1.25$3
Output Price / 1M tokens$5$15
Context Window2M200K
Best ForLarge codebase analysis and cost-effective code generationProfessional software engineering and code quality

Related Comparisons

Need Help Choosing the Right AI?

We help UK businesses integrate AI tools into their workflows. From model selection to full automation builds — we can help.

Disclaimer: Prices and features current as of February 2026. Check provider websites for latest pricing. Actual costs may vary based on usage tier, commitment discounts, and regional availability.